Archive for the ‘mac’ Category

NetNewsWire

Thursday, June 14th, 2007

I think I’m finally sick enough of Safari’s RSS implementation that I’m trialling the popular NetNewsWire aggregator program. Not like I have all that many subscriptions, it’s just that I have a few that are quite frequent (10 or so updates a day) and after a while, Safari just can’t cope. It’s slow, hard to read, and occasionally forgets where it’s up to. For friend’s blogs, which update maybe once or twice a week, Safari is fine. For Wired New Epicenter, it’s totally inadequate. And the constant updates in the menubar get on my nerves after a while. I want to keep track of the news, sure, but I want it out of the way so I can check it when I want to – not have it distractingly in my face, as the menubar is.

I don’t usually like to run 3rd party software when the defaults will do – and a place in the dock is valuable and usually reserved for only absolutely necessary software – but it’s become enough of a problem that it warrants a custom solution. Everything’s looking good for now.

Dock status, assembler style:

ADD NetNewsWire

SUB GraphicConverter (never use it, Phoenix Slides replaced it)
SUB Toast (never use it, i just realised)
SUB iChat (use it rarely enough that I’ll just use QuickSilver)

Leopard getting lamer by the minute

Wednesday, June 13th, 2007

Seems the larcenous relationship between Redmond and Cupertino can flow both ways, with Apple taking a page out of MS’s Vista handbook – the page entitled “cut all the good features before launch so nobody cares anymore!” Great page to steal, that one.

Don’t get me wrong, I love MacOS, I’ll be using it no matter what. But where’s the features? A new dock? A new finder? We waited almost 2 years for that?

One of the improvements I’d been hoping most for is full OS support – hopefully bootable – of Sun’s revolutionary ZFS file system. After a thankfully short-lived rumour that ZFS support had been dropped entirely, we have this clarification from Apple:

As a result, we have included ZFS — a read-only copy of ZFS — in Leopard.

Wow!!! Read-only access! That’s the best type!

You know what? That is a fucking worthless non-feature and they may as well not include it at all. Can someone tell me the point of a read-only hard disk? To say I am disappointed would be an understatement.

What next? It seems every second RSS update from the mac news sites are about some other feature being pulled. Just in from macrumors, about a cool-sounding fast restart feature in bootcamp:

I have it on good report from someone attending WWDC that this feature has been nixed.

Why?? Don’t they have enough people or something? The things I care about that will definitely be in Leopard are now these:

  • better, multithreaded finder – care factor 10/10
  • 3d dock with “stacks” – care factor 8/10
  • updated internal, especially multicore scheduler – care factor 7/10
  • quick view and spaces – care factor 6/10

I had to go look at the features list because I couldn’t even remember anything else. All the updates to iChat, etc are routine incremental updates to what amounts to commodity client software – I rarely use iChat since it doesn’t properly support GTalk/Jabber. It can’t even do a fucking file transfer. Mail? I don’t need “stationery” and actually dislike it when people format emails with HTML. Don’t really care about any of the other apps, I’m looking forward to iLife updates more than any of them.

It’s horrible to say but this is beginning to remind me of Vista. Delay, delay, delay, for no good reason – and all the interesting stuff gets cut. In the absence of any truly amazing interface improvements, the number one thing I was looking forward to was first-class ZFS support, and with that out of the picture, my anticipation has plummeted. I still look forward to it, sure – but genuine excitement has turned to routine “oh yeah, I’ll upgrade when it comes out, if I don’t hear of any major problems …”

UPDATE: OK, OK, after re-reading this it does sound kind of childish. I’m just pissed off god damn it. Every serious problem I’ve had with my computer in the last 5 years has been something to do with the fricking filesystem. Corrupt headers. Directory mismatch. Laboriously booting to DVD for the thousandth time and running Disk Utility from there, wasting half an hour. That’s why I was so hyped for ZFS .. and so disappointed when it doesn’t seem like it’ll be in. It’ll still be great, though. Just maybe not as amazingly great as I had been hoping.

Safari on Windows

Tuesday, June 12th, 2007

Like many, I was initially a bit confused by Apple’s announcement that they’d ported Safari to Windows. Why on earth would they do that, I wondered? How could that possible pay back the development effort?

Well, after some pondering, I’ve come up with some good points. In fact the more I think about it, the better it sounds. Firstly, here’s some points in APPL’s favour:

  • With the announcement that the iPhone’s only way of running 3rd party “applications” is if they’re Web 2.0, Safari is the “SDK” for iPhone. It’s a good plan for Apple to get that on as many machines as possible.
  • MS is starting a new push for some new proprietary “standards” like XAML. By providing a 3rd serious browser competitor on Windows, Apple dilutes the market and acts to somewhat inhibit MS’s horrible, horrible plans. Same for SilverLight.
  • Better iTunes/Quicktime integration.
  • Further exposure to the Apple “experience” for Windows users.
  • A whole lot of the necessary KHTML/WebKit porting work was apparently done by Adobe during its development of Apollo/AIR, which drastically cut Apple’s costs for the project

And why am I so happy about the announcement? Because I’m a web developer. In a stroke, there are now not one but TWO standards compliant, cross-platform browser platforms. Before today, there weren’t a lot of options for Windows users.. if you didn’t like Firefox for some reason, and I can think of plenty as I don’t much like it either, you were stuck with evil, evil IE. Despite the importance of web standards, it didn’t inspire confidence – a single, not very polished, open source application against the mighty MS juggernaut! Hardly the overwhelming victory for standards-compliant software one would hope for.

But now? A lot of people run iTunes. They like it. They’ll start checking out Safari. And suddenly, it’s 2 open, full featured, standards compliant web browsers against one old, clunky nightmare.

If your standard-compliant site didn’t run well on IE, you didn’t have many excuses. “You should run Firefox!” you cried .. but it was a pretty small voice against a very large crowd. But now? Write a standards compliant web browser and suddenly you support 2 out of 3 major browsers on windows. If WinSafari becomes popular .. we can finally start ignoring IE for the broken-down POS it is.

Now THAT is why I’m excited. Imagine if Safari takes 20% of the Win32 market. 30%? 40%? Man, if IE went under 50% I, and about 100,000 other web developers, would throw a year-long party.

So anyway. It’s good news. It’s really good news. The browser isn’t the OS yet, but it’s moving in that direction, and it’s really important the standards-based platform wins – and with Apple now fighting in the PC market as well, that happy ending just became a whole lot more probable.

MacBook Pro 6 Bit Screens

Monday, May 21st, 2007

Some information I’m not very happy with:

EDID output:

EDID Version……..1.3
Manufacturer……..APP
Product Code……..24732 (609C) (9C60)
Serial Number…….0

9C60 => AU Optronics B154PW01 V0.

B154PW01 Specs:

B154PW01 Specs

From a korean site, since the AUO original is unavailable.

Apple Japan MacBook Pro Specifications Page:

Apple Japan MacBook Pro Specifications Page

約1670万色対応 => “Approximately 16.7 million colors”. Last I checked, 16,777,216 is not “approximately” 262,144 – in fact, one is a 64-fold multiple of the other. In other words, this is clear-cut false advertising.

This better be a free replacement. Would you buy a $3000+ laptop whose specifications read “Display: 262k colors”?

UPDATE: I’d just like to clarify that I can’t see any dithering at all on these screens. I still don’t like them, but that’s more to do with the fact that it’s a single-backlight LCD screen and I’ve always hated pretty much all LCD screens in general, especially single backlight ones. My own desktop screen is 6-bit as well. But LCD as a whole is a nasty hack of a technology – the best LCDs I’ve ever seen still look like complete crap compared to my old Trinitron. There’s a whole class of colour that, as far as I know, LCD just can’t display – deep, warm blues and reds – they’re just absent on every LCD screen I’ve ever seen, and I loathe the tunnel effect of the disconnected light source and “filter” of the LCD. OLED can’t come fast enough!

That doesn’t change the fact that it’s false advertising. Everyone else might do it but we expect, and pay for, a better level of treatment from Apple.

Transmission now usable with Oink

Friday, May 18th, 2007

Great news for anyone sick of the bloated monster Azureus – Transmission now works with Oink. Finally, a good alternative to Azureus for MacOSX!

The last domino falls

Saturday, April 28th, 2007

With my final non-mac-using friend ordering a MacBook Pro today, I now don’t know anyone with a PC.

Good.